The numbers game isn’t the only game in town. Even though Obama, as you’ve noted, picked creative and talented people, no one is ever satisfied. Latinos want more Latinos, women want more women, etc. Quality, not just quantity, is important, and, no matter whom Obama picks, someone will be unhappy.

The author also mentions Bush’s appointments, as if that is something Obama should emulate. Tokenism and ovaries are not replacements for competency. Moreover, Women (Sen. Clinton and Dr. Rice) will be the face of the United States in 2 of the most internationally visible cabinet positions. If that doesn’t send a message what does? Also, the women he picked are no shrinking violets, and the accomplishments and fortitude of Sen. Clinton places in a position to become on of the most influential cabinet members.

Plus, change and empowerment of women doesn’t only have to be at the cabinet level. Don’t discount the other women who will be placed in key and powerful position through his administration. Everyone likes to focus on the Cabinet, but overlook other offices of influence that have less fancy titles.

Obama obviously cares about the well-being of women. His mother was a single mom and he spoke of the sacrifices she and his grandmother made for him. He put his grandmother first before his campaign to be with her before she died. He is also married to a strong, successful woman who he has two little girls with and openly shows he cares for them and recognizes the sacrifices they have made and will continue to make as the First Family.

Not all women “get it” and not all women look out for other women, as evidenced by Sec. Rice. President Bush, who appointed more women, didn’t get it in the end, either.

Cabinet appointments won’t be the measure of Obama’s regard for women, ultimately his policies will.