By S.C. Sen. Brad Hutto (D-Orangeburg)
As the nation struggles with its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression some in Washington, D.C., are fighting a rear-guard action to block the President Obama’s stimulus plan.
And among them, U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, is jockeying to become leader of the heel-dragging pack.
This professional ad man knows the importance of burnishing his brand. He has become a stock fixture on the national media circuit. If you need someone to defend the failed economic policies of former president George Bush, schedule Jim DeMint for your show.
DeMint’s ideas sound good to a dwindling number of true-believers who think tax cuts can solve any problem and that magical forces will repair an economy in disarray without public intervention.
What’s becoming increasingly apparent is that DeMint is not only out of step with Democrats and moderate Republicans, but that he is also out of touch with the real world – the one where South Carolinians live.
DeMint on Tuesday voted against the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which fortunately passed the Senate with a 61-37 vote. The stimulus package is designed to get money into the economy quickly through spending projects to save or create 3 million U.S. jobs over the next four years. The version passed by the House Jan. 28 included $3.2 billion for South Carolina’s needs from road repairs to college tuitions.
On ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” Feb. 1 DeMint joined a conversation that also included U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and two chief executives – FedEx’s Fred Smith and Google’s Eric Schmidt.
Google has particular interest for South Carolinians. The company recently opened a computer data center in Berkeley County, and has bought land in Richland County, where it might open another – if demand is there.
But DeMint thought he should lecture the chief executive of one of the most successful American companies about economics, trotting out studies from the conservative Heritage Foundation that favors tax cuts over direct public spending.
Schmidt, a soft-spoken man who measures his words carefully, replied, “I’m worried that tax cuts alone … won’t be sufficient because people are not paying any taxes because they’re not making any money.”
“There are plenty of cases where directed spending does help things to happen more quickly,” Schmidt said. “Most of the [stimulus package] money actually goes to reasonably short-term things in education, state relief, various other things that help people in the very short term. Some combination of all that money has got to get out now to get people going again.”
Schmidt and Smith, the FedEx chief executive, shared one message: Congress needs to act quickly to get the economy moving. “I’m sure this stuff is going to get fixed by you guys, because you’re working very hard on it,” Schmidt said.
“I wouldn’t count on it,” DeMint replied.
This is not the first time DeMint has made such comments.
In a column that ran Jan. 22 in The State he warned Republicans against helping President Obama pass a meaningful stimulus plan. “Should the bill fail to revive the economy, its bipartisan character would inoculate the new president from sole responsibility for what Republicans could otherwise brand “The Obama Recession.”
DeMint is using one of South Carolina’s seats in the U.S. Senate to act like a hedge fund manager – trying to lure citizens and donors to bet that the economic failure his party created will worsen.
South Carolinians can’t afford to be so cynical.
Hutto represents Allendale, Bamberg, Barnwell and Orangeburg counties. He can be reached at CBH@scsenate.org.
Obama Administration continues US military global dominance
Thursday, February 19th, 2009By Peter Phillips
Project Censored
The Barack Obama administration is continuing the neo-conservative agenda of US military domination of the world — albeit with perhaps with a kinder-gentler face. While overt torture is now forbidden for the CIA and Pentagon, and symbolic gestures like the closing of the Guantanamo prison are in evidence, a unilateral military dominance policy, expanding military budget, and wars of occupation and aggression will likely continue unabated.
The military expansionists from within the Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton, G. W. Bush administrations all put into place solid support for increased military spending. Clinton’s model of supporting the US military industrial complex was to hold steady defense spending and to increase foreign weapons sales from 16 percent of global orders to over 60 percent by end of his administration.
The neo-conservatives, who dominated the most recent Bush administration, amplified this trend for increased military spending. The neo-cons laid out their agenda for military global dominance in the 2000 Project for a New American Century (PNAC) report Rebuilding America’s Defenses. The report called for the protection of the American Homeland, the ability to wage simultaneous theater wars, to perform global constabulary roles, and to control space and cyberspace. The report claimed that in order to maintain a Pax Americana, potential rivals — such as China, Iran, Iraq, and North Korea — needed to be held in check. Their military global dominance agenda required forward deployment of US forces worldwide and increasing defense/war spending well into the 21st century. The result was a doubling of the US military budget to over $700 billion in the last eight years. The US now spends as much on war/defense as the rest of the world combined making American taxpayers the highest war tax providers in the world.
Obama’s election brought a moment of hope for many. However, the Obama administration is not calling for deceased military spending, or a reversal of US military global dominance. Instead, Obama retained Robert Gates, thus making Obama the first president from an opposing party, in US history, to keep in place the outgoing administrations’ Secretary of Defense/War. Additionally, Obama is calling for an expanded war in Afghanistan and only minimal long-range reductions in Iraq.
(more…)
Posted in National News/Commentary | 1 Comment »