By Sara Tansey
Jenkinsville, SC
For months, community members in Jenkinsville, SC, have been meeting, organizing, and growing more vocal about their frustrations with the local utility that wants to build two more reactors in a community that already hosts one unit. So when I spoke with community members who were itching to move beyond just organizing to Nuclear Regulatory Commission deadlines, we set a date two Tuesdays from that Sunday. At the time, I didn’t realize that was the Tuesday of my 21st birthday. When it hit me, I knew it was going to be perfect.
So last night, we met at the local park, proudly owned and operated by the same utility that owns and operates the nuclear facility in Jenkinsville. It boasts a “scenic view,” and it sure is a view. Down by the water’s edge are covered picnic tables, a bit of beach for the locals to enjoy, a fishing dock and right across the water sits VC Summer. Beautiful!
We gathered around one of the picnic tables, enjoyed the summer weather and a cooling breeze off of the lake. And as we — community leaders, youth activists and other no-nuke activists — plotted how to stop two more reactors from being built in this community, we pulled strength and determination from the vision of devastation that lay across the water.
A vision of economic and human health devastation. SCE&G has stated in their own environmental report that less than 10 percent of new jobs will go to residents of the county, let alone the surrounding community, and that they do not expect any economic stimulation for the Jenkinsville area as a result of expansion.
Furthermore, cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the first reactor, and many local residents live off of the land. They have home gardens, fish from the lake and rivers and hunt local game to feed their families.
So sharing that community and mutual passion, creating next steps and a plan we all worked on together, knowing that we were organizing to do something to humble that boastful and unsuspecting utility that built a park and thought their contributions to the community ended there, was the best 21st birthday gift I could have asked for. Knowing that each one of us sitting around that picnic table was determined with our lives to stop this proposed expansion gave me goosebumps that I blamed on the water’s winds and that, in this southern heat today, I cannot excuse away.
To learn more about the community organizing efforts in Jenkinsville, email Sara Tansey at Sara@climateaction.net and stay tuned!










Gilda for Governor?
Friday, April 17th, 2009Gilda Cobb-Hunter (D-Orangeburg) speaks at the People’s Stimulus Rally April 1 at the State House.
*****************
It’s been seven long years since a movement to draft Gilda Cobb-Hunter to run for governor ran into a roadblock: the prospective candidate herself. “South Carolina isn’t ready for a black woman to be governor,” she said. She declined to enter the race against Jim Hodges, and Mark Sanford was elected governor.
The buzz among friends who know her best is that she is open to reconsidering a run for governor or, perhaps, taking on Sen. Jim DeMint for his US Senate seat.
A lot has changed in seven years, not the least of which is that we have a black man in the White House. White men — from president, to governor to the legislature — have proven their inability to meaningfully address the problems facing our state and nation; it may well be time for Gilda to reconsider her earlier hesitancy.
The Democratic Party is fielding some nice guys to contend for its nomination for governor. Sen. Vince Sheheen of Camden, Rep. Harry Ott of Calhoun County, and Mullins McLeod of Charleston are names being mentioned. But they don’t resonate with the demand for substantive change that could inspire new South Carolina voters. We can’t expect their candidacies to be far removed from the traditional Democratic strategy of playing to the right of center to pick off a couple of percentage points from the Republican vote. This is the “Republican Lite” strategy that has failed for the past 30 years.
But what if a bold candidate spoke to the 43 percent of South Carolinians who did not vote in the last election?
To put it in perspective, McCain got 1,034,896 votes in South Carolina’s last general election; Obama got 862,449. That adds up to 1,897,345 South Carolinians who voted. Sitting it out were 1,472,048 of the voting-age population (24 percent of them registered voters) who didn’t vote. That’s an untapped market of 43 percent of folks in this state who could vote but chose not to.
We only need to mobilize 12 percent of the people who don’t vote to turn the state blue. Of all the Democratic candidates mentioned, Gilda has the magic to make this happen. She is the one person in the legislature who be counted on to vote in the interest of working people, minorities and the disenfranchised. Her candidacy for governor or US Senate would inject a level of enthusiasm into the race — helping all Democratic candidates — that nobody else could provide.
What do you think? Email scprogressivecaucus@earthlink.com to voice your opinion. Should Gilda run for governor, US Senate, or stay in the State House?
Sign spotted at a rally a few years ago suggests how loved Gilda is among her constituents.
Posted in National News/Commentary, Network News/Events, SC News/Commentary | 10 Comments »