<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SC Prog Blog &#187; census</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scpronet.com/wordpress/tag/census/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scpronet.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>SC Progressive Network news and views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>South&#8217;s clout to grow after 2010 Census, but how much?</title>
		<link>http://www.scpronet.com/wordpress/2010/01/07/souths-clout-to-grow-after-2010-census-but-how-much/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scpronet.com/wordpress/2010/01/07/souths-clout-to-grow-after-2010-census-but-how-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 01:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Becci</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National News/Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SC News/Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institute for southern studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scpronet.com/wordpress/?p=1837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Chris Kromm Institute for Southern Studies Remember last year, when pundits declared that the 2008 elections were proof of the South&#8217;s waning hold on national politics? That didn&#8217;t jibe with our analysis at Facing South. We showed that there was evidence not only of short-term political change in the South (one-third of the region&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Chris Kromm</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.southernstudies.org">Institute for Southern Studies</a></p>
<p>Remember last year, when pundits declared that the 2008 elections were proof of the South&#8217;s waning hold on national politics?</p>
<p>That didn&#8217;t jibe with our analysis at Facing South. We showed that there was evidence not only of short-term political change in the South (one-third of the region&#8217;s Electoral College votes went to President-elect Obama), but an important long-term trend: the South&#8217;s political clout is growing, thanks to burgeoning population growth that will translate into more Electoral College votes and Congressional seats after the 2010 Census.</p>
<p>We won&#8217;t know exactly how many seats the South will gain until the Census wraps this December. But we have a good idea thanks to the Census Bureau&#8217;s latest state population estimates, which came out last month.</p>
<p>Using those estimates, Election Data Services projects that Southern states will gain six Congressional seats and Electoral College votes, mostly at the expense of states in the Northeast and Midwest.</p>
<p>Using several different projection models, EDS concludes:</p>
<p>Overall, the new 2009 estimates show that ten congressional seats in 17 states have already changed at this point in the decade [...]. Seven states &#8212; Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah and Washington &#8212; would each gain a seat and Texas would gain three seats if the U.S. House of Representatives were reapportioned with census population estimates for July 1, 2009.</p>
<p>Drilling down into the data a little further, some interesting questions and scenarios remain:</p>
<p>* How big will Texas get? Texas will be the biggest gainer, but by how much? EDS conservatively estimates the Lone Star state will pick up three Congressional seats/Electoral College votes. But a projection based on more recent population growth &#8212; which has stayed high in Texas while other states like Florida and North Carolina have leveled off &#8212; shows it gaining four.</p>
<p>* Will troops mean gains for North Carolina? Fast-growing NC has been a top contender for picking up a seat after 2010. But EDS says &#8220;all six models now show the state will just miss gaining an additional seat next year.&#8221; But there&#8217;s a big wild card: None of the EDS projections account for military personnel stationed overseas &#8212; a major factor in military-friendly North Carolina, whose growing bases helped the Tar Heel state gain a seat in 2000 over Utah.</p>
<p>* National surprises? Changing population trends are creating question marks in other parts of the country. Oregon, once considered a shoo-in for gaining a seat, now appears out of the running. California was projected to lose a seat last year, but now appears safe. Growth has stalled in Arizona and Nevada, but they&#8217;re still safe to gain a seat each, maybe two for Arizona.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s Louisiana. With the five-year anniversary of Katrina approaching, all of EDS&#8217; projections show the state losing a Congressional seat.</p>
<p>There will likely be a few surprises after the 2010 Census count has wrapped. But the broader trend is clear: a shift in population and political power to the South and West.<br />
<strong><br />
INSTITUTE INDEX &#8211; Counting the children</strong></p>
<p>    * Rank of children among the age groups most often missed in the Census: 1<br />
    * Net undercount of children under age 10 in the 2000 Census: 1 million<br />
    * Net undercount of children under age 5: more than 750,000<br />
    * Rank of minorities among those children missed most often: 1<br />
    * Percentage rate at which black males under age 5 were missed in 2000: 5.3<br />
    * Percentage rate at which non-black males in that age group were missed: 3.3<br />
    * Percentage rate at which black females under age 5 were missed in 2000: 5.4<br />
    * Percentage rate at which non-black females in that age group were missed: 3.8<br />
    * Compared to the elderly, increased likelihood for children to live in hard-to-count areas: 50%<br />
    * Percent of all children who live in hard-to-count areas: 20<br />
    * Number of government programs serving families in need for which Census counts are used to calculate funding: more than 140<br />
    * Amount of federal funding those programs distribute: more than $400 billion<br />
    * Percentage points by which the U.S. population of children under age 5 is estimated to have risen since 2000: 6<br />
    * Estimated increase from 2003 to 2006 in the number of children with at least one unauthorized-immigrant parent, which complicates counting: 1.6 million<br />
    * Estimated number of children affected by the housing crisis, which also makes it more difficult to get an accurate population count: 2 million</p>
<p>(All figures from &#8220;Why Are Young Children Missed So Often in the Census?,&#8221; Dr. William P. O&#8217;Hare for The Annie E. Casey Foundation, December 2009.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scpronet.com/wordpress/2010/01/07/souths-clout-to-grow-after-2010-census-but-how-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

