Obama Administration continues US military global dominance

By Peter Phillips
Project Censored

The Barack Obama administration is continuing the neo-conservative agenda of US military domination of the world — albeit with perhaps with a kinder-gentler face. While overt torture is now forbidden for the CIA and Pentagon, and symbolic gestures like the closing of the Guantanamo prison are in evidence, a unilateral military dominance policy, expanding military budget, and wars of occupation and aggression will likely continue unabated.

The military expansionists from within the Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton, G. W. Bush administrations all put into place solid support for increased military spending. Clinton’s model of supporting the US military industrial complex was to hold steady defense spending and to increase foreign weapons sales from 16 percent of global orders to over 60 percent by end of his administration.

The neo-conservatives, who dominated the most recent Bush administration, amplified this trend for increased military spending. The neo-cons laid out their agenda for military global dominance in the 2000 Project for a New American Century (PNAC) report Rebuilding America’s Defenses. The report called for the protection of the American Homeland, the ability to wage simultaneous theater wars, to perform global constabulary roles, and to control space and cyberspace. The report claimed that in order to maintain a Pax Americana, potential rivals — such as China, Iran, Iraq, and North Korea — needed to be held in check. Their military global dominance agenda required forward deployment of US forces worldwide and increasing defense/war spending well into the 21st century. The result was a doubling of the US military budget to over $700 billion in the last eight years. The US now spends as much on war/defense as the rest of the world combined making American taxpayers the highest war tax providers in the world.

Obama’s election brought a moment of hope for many. However, the Obama administration is not calling for deceased military spending, or a reversal of US military global dominance. Instead, Obama retained Robert Gates, thus making Obama the first president from an opposing party, in US history, to keep in place the outgoing administrations’ Secretary of Defense/War. Additionally, Obama is calling for an expanded war in Afghanistan and only minimal long-range reductions in Iraq.

Continue reading

Legislation addresses pay-to-play politics

This week, Sen. Clementa Pinckney (D-Jasper) and Rep. Joseph Neal (D-Richland) introduced legislation to address the corrupting influence of money in politics. They have sponsored bills that would provide an alternative to politicians taking cash from industries they regulate.

“There has been much hand-wringing about the payday lending industry’s large infusion of cash to legislators,” said Sen. Pinckney. “While most people shake their heads and say ‘that’s politics,’ the truth is that it doesn’t have to be this way.”

Rep. Neal said, “Legislators feel trapped in a system of private funding for public office, and there is a perception that legislators pay more attention to the concerns of their contributors than they do to their constituents. We looked at the increasing cost of running for public office and the decreasing number of candidates, and came up with a workable and affordable plan to reduce the control that money has on our elections and our decisions as legislators.”

While the Clean Elections Act has been introduced every session since 2000, this year there is a separate bill for a study committee to create a pilot program.

The legislation would bring comprehensive campaign finance reform that provides a system of public funding for candidates for legislative and statewide offices who pledge not to accept any private contributions and agree to spending limits. “Clean Elections” as the initiative is referred to in the states where it is practiced, would provide grants to qualifying candidates that are based on the average amount spent to win a particular office.

Continue reading

On Jim DeMint, Milton Fiedman…and Jesus

By Charlie Smith
Charleston

US Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) has proven himself to be the stereotypical “Christian Republican” who professes to the world that he is practicing the teachings of Christ in his policy-making, when in fact he is merely parroting the most unChrist-like teachings of Milton Friedman. Note to Senator DeMint: There is absolutely no way to reconcile the teachings of Christ with the teachings of Milton Friedman…especially on the subject of greed. Government exists to serve the needs of human beings first…not those of big business first.

Sen. Demint’s almost “Branch Davidian” reverence to Friedman’s unregulated, free-market, “Chicago School” economic philosophy demonstrates his total lack of knowledge of the history of its disastrous applications in the modern world. Since 1970 “Chicago School” economic policy has destroyed both the people and the economies of Chile, Bolivia, Argentina and Poland to name just a few. Total economic devastation was forced upon these resource rich, but economically downtrodden people by Friedman’s “Chicago Boys” at a time when their economies were totally vulnerable to unbridled American corporate greed. Every asset held in trust for these people by their governments that could be “privatized” was sold off to the highest bidder in return for a few high-interest shekels from the IMF and the World Bank. Anyone who opposed these policies ran the risk of being tortured, murdered, “disappeared” or any combination thereof. Neither the people nor the economies of these countries have ever fully recovered; but American Corporations, the IMF and the World Bank have continued to “acquire” whatever they wanted and move on to the next victim. Afghanistan and Iraq are being sucked dry as we speak. Apparently we learned nothing from Germany after World War I.

Continue reading

Show me the money, and I’ll show you a broken political system

Making the case for Clean Elections

Yesterday, Sen. Clementa Pinckney (D-Jasper) introduced the Clean Elections Act, legislation the SC Progressive Network has supported since 2000. Here is a four-minute video clip SC ETV made in 2007 on the pros and cons of publicly financed elections.

SC Progressive Network Director Brett Bursey talks about clean elections at a Columbia CLC picnic in July 2007.

Read about the Network’s campaign for clean elections that ran in the fall 2000 issue of POINT by clicking here.

Legislative Looney Toones

By Brett Bursey

Director, SC Progressive Network

Upon our state’s preparing to secede from the Union, James Petigru observed, “South Carolina is too large to be a lunatic asylum and too small to be a republic.” True to form, it seems our legislators insist on swimming against history’s tide and holding fast to all manner of lunacy.

On Thursday, Feb. 19, the legislature will be holding hearings on bills that may prove Petigru wrong about limits on the size of an asylum.

The Senate Agriculture Committee is taking up (again) a bill (S-232) at 10am in 406-Gressett, to include nuclear power as a “renewable” resource. While it is a fantasy of the nuclear industry to catch the renewable energy wave by painting nuclear fusion green, there is not a damn thing renewable about nuclear power except the industry’s audacity. (Remember in the 1950s when radiation was measured in “sunshine units”?)

These same lunatics run the asylum that passed legislation last session to let private corporations charge rate payers – up front – to build nuclear reactors. SCE&G predicts a 37 percent increase in your utility bills over the next decade to subsidize construction that can’t get private financing or insurance. It’s likely that the final bill will be twice what SCE&G claims.

A rational legislature, concerned about our energy future, could have put a similar golden carrot on the stick that led to the development of real renewable resources.

How many of us would install solar panels if we could pay for them incrementally over a decade? How many good and enduring jobs could be generated if we put support behind real renewables? The $4.5 billion dollar reactor is predicted to provide 500 jobs after construction. That’s a cost of $9 million a job.

At the same Senate Agriculture hearing Thursday, Sen. Robert Ford will be pushing a bill (S-44) that opens our coast to offshore drilling and expedited DHEC licenses. It remains to be seen whether the Obama administration will remove federal prohibitions on coastal oil and gas drilling.

Ford, you may recall, is the black legislator who said America isn’t ready for a black president. At the time, Ford was on Hillary Clinton’s payroll.

The solution to pay-to-play politics

This column ran in the online version of The State‘s editorial page. John Crangle’s group, Common Cause South Carolina, is a member of the SC Progressive Network.

**********************************

By Bob Edgar and John V. Crangle

The avalanche of scandals of the past six months simply adds to the mountain of evidence that America must change the way it pays for its elections. The cases of former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens and Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich illustrate the problems of America’s pay-to-play political system.

Our highest-bidder style of campaign fundraising is an open invitation to more scandals at every level of government. It also invites public cynicism because those who want something from government – whether it’s a tax break, a lucrative contract or favorable legislation – make the largest contributions to political campaigns.

It is difficult today to tell the difference between legal contributions to political candidates and illegal contributions made with an express quid pro quo. Lawmakers who serve on committees with jurisdiction over specific issues and sectors of the economy receive much of their campaign money from the very industries they are supposed to regulate. The most appalling cases of this are congressional committees that are supposed to watch Wall Street, but outrageously fail to do so.

In the wake of an $800 billion trillion stimulus package that features road work and other infrastructure projects in the states, we are likely to see this pay-to-play culture get even worse. The ultimate solution is to create a voluntary system of public funding under which federal and state candidates run vigorous campaigns funded by a combination of small contributions and limited public dollars.

Continue reading

Network moves into historic Simkins House

The SC Progressive Network has set up shop in the Modjeska Simkins House in downtown Columbia. We have been using the space for our monthly Midlands meetings over the past year, thanks to Historic Columbia Foundation, which has managed the property since 2007. In February we signed a lease to rent the house, and are now holding regular office hours there.

When Foundation Director Robin Waites handed over the keys, she said, “Modjeska must be smiling right now.”

Ms. Simkins was the matriarch of the state’s civil rights movement. Her work spanned six decades, until her death in 1992. The home where she lived for 60 years sits on a lot at 2025 Marion Street just off Elmwood. It served as office and meeting place, and housed visiting civil rights advocates, including Thurgood Marshall.

“The place has a really good vibe,” said Midlands Co-ordinator John Dawkins. “I’m excited to be moving into a space with so much history.”

Network Director Brett Bursey said, “We haven’t given up on owning our own building, but this is a gracious offer that is a good fit for us right now. Having offices right downtown will allow us to work with interns and volunteers, and will keep us more engaged with what’s happening in the city and in the State House.”

The Simkins House is fully accessible, has two offices, a kitchen, a sun room, a proper front porch and two meeting rooms — which we invite our member groups to use.

One of the first groups to express interest in holding meetings at the Network’s new headquarters is the Greater Columbia Central Labor Council. It has been meeting at the office of the state AFL-CIO, which is in the process of moving outside of Columbia.

“The timing is perfect for us,” said SC AFL-CIO President Donna Dewitt, who serves as Network Co-chair. “We’ll have a place to hold meetings as well as access to office space when we are in Columbia to lobby or attend hearings,” she said. “I think it’s going to be a vibrant place for our Network members to congregate and collaborate.”

Bursey said, “I worked closely with Ms. Simkins for 25 years, and was proud that she called me one of her children. It seems a wonderful opportunity to keep Modjeska’s spirit alive.”

If you are interested in using the House to hold your group’s meetings, call us at 803-808-3384 or email network@scpronet.com.

For more photos of the Simkins House, taken on Moving Day and at our first meeting in our new headquarters, click here.

 

Modjeska Simkins

***************

Join us for a house warming party March 7, 5:30-7pm
Modjeska Simkins House, 2025 Marion St., Columbia
FREE and open to all. Come help us celebrate!

DeMint short-selling U.S. economy

By S.C. Sen. Brad Hutto (D-Orangeburg)

As the nation struggles with its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression some in Washington, D.C., are fighting a rear-guard action to block the President Obama’s stimulus plan.

And among them, U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, is jockeying to become leader of the heel-dragging pack.

This professional ad man knows the importance of burnishing his brand. He has become a stock fixture on the national media circuit. If you need someone to defend the failed economic policies of former president George Bush, schedule Jim DeMint for your show.

DeMint’s ideas sound good to a dwindling number of true-believers who think tax cuts can solve any problem and that magical forces will repair an economy in disarray without public intervention.

What’s becoming increasingly apparent is that DeMint is not only out of step with Democrats and moderate Republicans, but that he is also out of touch with the real world – the one where South Carolinians live.

DeMint on Tuesday voted against the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which fortunately passed the Senate with a 61-37 vote. The stimulus package is designed to get money into the economy quickly through spending projects to save or create 3 million U.S. jobs over the next four years. The version passed by the House Jan. 28 included $3.2 billion for South Carolina’s needs from road repairs to college tuitions.

On ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” Feb. 1 DeMint joined a conversation that also included U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and two chief executives – FedEx’s Fred Smith and Google’s Eric Schmidt.

Google has particular interest for South Carolinians. The company recently opened a computer data center in Berkeley County, and has bought land in Richland County, where it might open another – if demand is there.

But DeMint thought he should lecture the chief executive of one of the most successful American companies about economics, trotting out studies from the conservative Heritage Foundation that favors tax cuts over direct public spending.

Schmidt, a soft-spoken man who measures his words carefully, replied, “I’m worried that tax cuts alone … won’t be sufficient because people are not paying any taxes because they’re not making any money.”

“There are plenty of cases where directed spending does help things to happen more quickly,” Schmidt said. “Most of the [stimulus package] money actually goes to reasonably short-term things in education, state relief, various other things that help people in the very short term. Some combination of all that money has got to get out now to get people going again.”

Schmidt and Smith, the FedEx chief executive, shared one message: Congress needs to act quickly to get the economy moving. “I’m sure this stuff is going to get fixed by you guys, because you’re working very hard on it,” Schmidt said.

“I wouldn’t count on it,” DeMint replied.

This is not the first time DeMint has made such comments.

In a column that ran Jan. 22 in The State he warned Republicans against helping President Obama pass a meaningful stimulus plan. “Should the bill fail to revive the economy, its bipartisan character would inoculate the new president from sole responsibility for what Republicans could otherwise brand “The Obama Recession.”

DeMint is using one of South Carolina’s seats in the U.S. Senate to act like a hedge fund manager – trying to lure citizens and donors to bet that the economic failure his party created will worsen.

South Carolinians can’t afford to be so cynical.

Hutto represents Allendale, Bamberg, Barnwell and Orangeburg counties. He can be reached at CBH@scsenate.org.