Blah, blah, blah
Arnold Karr
Columbia
This is the response I got from Sen. Jim DeMint about the Consumer-First Energy Act.
***********
Dear Mr. Karr,
Thank you for contacting me regarding S. 3044, the Consumer-First Energy Act. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue.
As you may know, S. 3044, the Consumer-First Energy Act was introduced by Senator Harry Reid of Nevada. This bill would raise taxes on our domestic energy companies by over $18 billion and use the additional tax revenue to incentivize a limited scope of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, and biofuels through tax credits and bonds.
While I support the increased development of renewable energy technologies, this bill would dramatically raise taxes on every American, through higher energy costs, in order to provide tax incentives to a small group of people developing renewable technologies. In addition, this bill restricts the types of renewable technologies that will qualify for the credits in the bill.
I believe America must move towards a more robust and diverse energy portfolio in an effort to increase our energy security and independence. In order to do that, we must develop our domestic energy resources, expand our refining capacity, and explore the full range of clean and alternative energy technologies.
If we are serious about diversifying our energy portfolio, the government should not be picking certain types of renewable technologies at the expense of other technologies. We must pursue many different solutions, increase domestic oil production, and build more nuclear power plants to create more competition in the energy markets. Allowing markets to work will keep prices down and help create alternative energy sources.
During my time in Congress, I have consistently supported developing our domestic energy sources, encouraging alternative technologies, and reducing overtly bureaucratic regulations on energy production. In addition, I have pushed for the increased use of nuclear energy to provide a clean base of electricity that is safe and affordable. You can be sure I will continue to fight for common sense solutions that address America’s energy problems.
Currently, S. 3044 failed a procedural vote on June 10, 2008. Rest assured, I will keep your thoughts in mind as Congress towards finding solutions for the challenges we face.
Thank you again for sharing your thoughts with me. Allow we do not see eye-to-eye on this issue, please feel free to contact me again in the future with anything important to you or your family. It is an honor to serve you and the people of South Carolina.
Sincerely,
Jim DeMint
United States Senator
Happy Independence Day
Wage peace
Wade Fulmer, Columbia
member of Veterans for Peace
Beth, a mother and grandmother, is a Military Families Speak Out member who delivered this speech at a week ago conference.
The battles of blood for oil are far from over. Our soldiers and families and Iraqis continue to suffer by the unending occupations of two wars of six and seven years, killing our own, bomb bomb bombing McCainiac style Iraqi children and families by way of the madness of Administration and the lack of a Congress of conscience to govern by Our Own Constitution. The Congress continues bankrupt funding of carnage and refuse to hold Captiol Hill war criminal politicos responsible for killing and maiming war crimes against humanity. There is a Constitution, yes, that must be revived, lived! There is no Congress with the will to speak for peoples, to end their sufferings, deployment extensions, and stop loss betrayals of those who serve.
OUR America must strongly voice the inner outrage, must rebell against pharisean, unchristian, illegal, unconscionable war, its fear mongering myth, and the damn the peace arrogance of warful officials who are not representatives of the People.
We on this 4th of July must reclaim and demand the rights of truth and Constitution to protect and defend for the care and honorable service that our soldier loved ones seek, to end the abusive murders of families and sovereign peoples. There is no obligation nor honor nor empathy as they suffer and die for the corporate war profits machine who bribe the Congress for monied bloodshed. Confront and hold officials accountable. Hold, protect and defend soldiers and families as your loved ones.
********
Beth’s Speech
I have four scary words for you: we need to talk.
I need to share with you some of my experiences with Military Families Speak Out, a national organization with 4,000 members whose loved ones have served or are serving in the military.
And here’s the problem — unless you have skin in the game — and members of MFSO do, you may not understand what’s really at stake here, or even care.
But we need each other.
Some of you may think that anyone who goes into the military is either stupid, blood-thirsty or deserving of what they get for fighting in an illegal and immoral war. But we know them as kids needing a job, health care or educational benefits. Good men and women just like your brothers and sisters — sons and daughters.
We, as a nation, have been sheltered from the reality of this war, but I’d like to share some of our experiences with you. Share what it is like to see the young Marine with his face burned beyond recognition, just eyes and a mouth, his ears and an arm missing — looking lost in a hospital cafeteria.
To share with you what it’s like to spend Mother’s Day at Arlington Cemetery, accompanying mothers who go to visit their only children, who lie buried among sea of other parents’ children who will never again know the embrace of their mother. Each is someone’s beloved child.
We need you to listen to us. We need you to HEAR us.
Hear about Pierre Piche, who was killed in a helicopter crash in 2004. When Pierre wrote home to his family, he didn’t ask for things for himself, but rather for food to take care of the many stray animals around him. The last picture of him is with a donkey that had wandered into his tent. I think of him, and I see the picture of him holding a tiny puppy, with a wide smile across his face.
I think of my own daughter-in-law, who wrote that the children at the nearby refugee camp in Afghanistan had no warm clothes for the approaching winter, and asked us to send coats. And my MFSO friends did, until they had to find a storage place for the many, many boxes. I see a picture of her standing in the blowing snow with smiling children in only sweaters and sometimes barefoot. Her own three children were at home in Alaska.
As a friend wrote to me recently, if you have a loved one in the military and dare proposing peace, you get a double whammy. You get criticized by many in the peace movement because your loved one is in the military, and then you are criticized by those believe you are undermining the morale of the troops by protesting the war.
The constant fear, 24/7, that harm will come to our family members will wrap around your heart until you feel sometimes you cannot breathe. When a loved one shares the deepest wounds, it is doubly painful. Painful that they are experiencing this, and painful that you can do nothing about it.
Here are the words of one of our MFSO sons:
The weather here is cooling off a bit, but Ramadaan has brought an increased level of bullshit in our area. I’m so angry. Angry isn’t the right word, but it’s simple. We’ve had a busy week. A busy week. Snipers, IEDs, EFPs, Mortars. I’ve seen the medevac chopper land in our compound three or four seperate times, and it starts to take it’s toll. Chunks of flesh. What the hell is chunks of flesh? Disgusting. Bones coming out of the body. Blood soaked stretchers. The cries in the darkness of grown men. I saw a grown man come up behind his buddy and hold him like sweethearts do. He rested his chin on the shoulder of his friend, and they wept together. What is this all about? I’m confused. I’m angry. And, I’m fighting a war on two fronts. One is plenty enough for one man to handle.
I’m still alive. Still here and counting the days. I miss you…
His mother went on to write:
This is what my son wrote to me today.
Now, the other “war” he is fighting is at home — where his wife has developed a “relationship” with an old love.
This brings up another issue — the effect of multiple deployments on the families. This is typical of several emails I have received from MFSO members:
Since everyone has a divorce story you can add my son. His divorce will be final in July… My daughter-in-law told me he had changed so much when he came back the first time but she was willing to stick with it. Now I have to wonder how much more his personality will have altered when he comes back from this second trip.
He still tells me he loves me and calls me mama so there is still some of my precious son in there, but until we are face to face, I will be left to wonder.
The entire family is affected when someone is deployed. Those who are affected most of all are the Gold Star families — -those who have lost a loved one. From one of our Ohio Gold star members:
I know my brother was murdered by his own government – first for getting him into an illegal war that should never have happened, and, second, for not giving him the equipment and tools to do the job they’d given him.
Every time one of our rights or freedoms is ripped away from us, it hurts more because I know my brother dedicated his adult life to making sure we had them. He loved the ideal of service to his country, as most soldiers do. To give up what he was willing to die for is a slap in his face and is a tear on mine.
It hurts to tell people that he’s dead. Saying the words is an acknowledgement, a dagger to any fantasy you might have about where he is and what he’s doing that you use to get by.
No, the pain doesn’t diminish. You just learn to live all over again. Thank goodness for my support network – family, friends and other military and Gold Star families – who help keep my knees from buckling and my heart from giving up.
To us Gold Stars, I think, it often feels like the whole world is walking by and ignoring this pain.
In Loving Memory of US Army SSG Edward W. Carman
Nov. 1976 – Apr.2004
As Military families, we stand to lose more from this failed war than any one other than the Iraqis, whose deaths and casualties and suffering goes unnoticed even more than the sacrifice of our own troops. More than 40 Iraqi refugees have been settled in Dayton since January, and I listen to the stories of their suffering with great sadness until I think my own heart can no longer hold any more pain. And you know who has really stepped up more than any other group to really help and support these refugees in our community? It has been veterans and military families.
Military families’ and veterans’ voices are an asset to the movement BECAUSE we have so much to lose — those we love. We will never grow bored with this fight or move on to other issues.
We will never give up this struggle. Support the troops — bring them home now!
Gen. Mukasey must admit mistakes
Today’s seventh annual conference on Ballot Access and Voting Integrity is intended by its founder Attorney General John Ashcroft to train US Attorneys about the perils of individual voters, mostly Democrats and minorities, cheating at the ballot box. The past six conferences have reflected the Justice Department’s shift from protecting voting rights to prosecuting supposed “voting fraud.”
“Attorney General Michael Mukasey has an opportunity today to refute the perversion of his agency’s mission” said Brett Bursey, Director of the SC Progressive Network, which work on voting rights. “Under the Bush Administration, the focus of the Justice Department has been a punitive effort against supposed voter fraud, as opposed to the historical role of the department to insure voter access to the polls.”
A recent study by the Brennan Center of the NY School of Law found that individual voter fraud (the type the Justice Department is focusing on) is “less likely than being struck by lightning while waiting in line to vote.” The Director of the SC Election Commission recently told a State House Judiciary subcommittee hearing a bill that would require additional ID to register to vote that she did not know of a single case of individual voter fraud in South Carolina.
Bursey reported a clear case of voter suppression to the Voting Section during the 2004 election. “I got the guy on the phone who had approved the Section 5 move of a precinct in Beaufort County from a fire station to a gated community. Voters had to go past a private security guard to get to the polling place. If your name wasn’t on the precinct list, they wouldn’t let you in, which violated the statute that lets one vote a provisional ballot. They don’t allow pedestrians, so you had to have a car to vote. The Section 5 attorney told me he wouldn’t have approved moving the precinct if he knew it was a gated community. I asked him if he would put that in writing so I could advise County Election Directors not to locate polling places in gated communities and he refused. I was later told by former Voting Section staff Dr. Toby Moore that the remaining staff was afraid to do anything that might anger their partisan bosses.”
More than half of the career employees of the Voting Rights Section of the Justice Department have resigned since 2005, citing ethical conflicts arising from the politicization of their jobs. Moore, who resigned from the Section in 2006, told a US House Judiciary Subcommittee last October, “Until someone in the Department, in this administration or the next, admits to the mistakes of the past several years and restores credible leadership, the Voting Section of Civil Rights Division will remain a wounded institution. That ultimately harms not only employees of the Voting Section and minority voters, but all Americans.”
“The Justice Department’s focus on ‘voting integrity’ has been exposed as a partisan effort to suppress Democratic votes,” Bursey said, “and we are looking to Attorney General Mukasey to put a stop to it.”
Burroughs and Chapin builds on history of bigotry
By Charlie Smith
Charleston
Saturday’s headline in the Post and Courier’s Business section heralding the planned expansion of The Burroughs and Chapin Company into the South Carolina Lowcountry would seem on the surface to be good news for the Charleston real estate market. The reality is actually just the opposite. The reason being is that for 113 years this Myrtle Beach-based real estate company has made discrimination a central theme of its business operation. The Horry County Court House is filled with deeds dating from the early days of what is now The Burroughs and Chapin Company that contain such language as:
The property hereby conveyed shall not be sold, devised, mortgaged or donated to any person of the negro race nor to any corporation whose stock is controlled by members of said race, nor shall any members of said race be permitted to rent, lease or reside on said property without the joint consent of the grantor and a majority of the bona fide adult residents of Myrtle Beach and upon such terms as may be by them jointly agreed.
Later deeds excluded Jews, Asians and all other non-Caucasian races with language such as:
“Neither this property nor any part thereof, nor any interest therein shall ever be sold, leased or conveyed to anyone other than a person of the Caucasian race, or to a corporation owned and conducted by persons of the Caucasian race.”
Burroughs and Chapin continued this practice until a U.S. Supreme Court ruling forced them to change their policy on racial and religious discrimination. But the company was back at it again in the late 1990s, this time targeting the gay and lesbian citizens of Myrtle Beach. When then-Myrtle Beach Mayor Mark McBride called Gay and Lesbian citizens of the city “garbage” The Burroughs and Chapin Company was the first to jump on the bigotry bandwagon leading the charge to disrupt the 1998 Gay and Lesbian Pride events in Myrtle Beach. The company prohibited the 1970s-era musical group The Village People from performing on the grounds of a local night club during the event asserting their rights as the owner of the land on which the club had been built.
They also banned any events associated with the festival from being held at any of its other properties such as the Broadway at the Beach shopping and entertainment complex. The media battle that ensued over their bigotry lasted for more than six months and resulted in a tremendous loss of credibility for the company and a huge black eye for Myrtle Beach tourism. It also resulted in the largest Gay and lesbian Pride event South Carolina has ever witnessed.
Most of the churches in the Myrtle Beach area sit on land that was given to them by the Burroughs and Chapin Company. Representatives of the company are often allowed by these churches to make annual presentations to the congregations during which the company reps tell the church folks all about their plans for expanding their business in Myrtle Beach over the coming year. The great PR they achieve through these efforts tends to pay off handsomely at the ballot box for the candidates endorsed by Burroughs and Chapin for public office in Myrtle Beach and Horry County…candidates such as former Mayor Mark McBride.
The long and the short of it is that Charleston does not need the bigotry and political manipulation of The Burroughs and Chapin Company. What we need are companies that understand and appreciate the diversity of the people who have created this beautiful city in which we live and are willing to be good corporate citizens. The Burroughs and Chapin Company has a 113-year history of doing just the opposite.
What would Jesus do?
The Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Columbia is one of more than 300 congregations around the country displaying a banner outside their building that says “Torture is wrong.” It is a national campaign sponsored by the National Religious Coalition Against Torture. The UUFC is one of only two congregations in SC participating. The other is a Friends congregation in Conway.
Your church can get a banner to display by clicking here.
Funnies
Check out Southern Fried Rabbit. This Bugs has been banned.
It was oil, all along
By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship
Oh, no, they told us, Iraq isn’t a war about oil. That’s cynical and simplistic, they said. It’s about terror and al Qaeda and toppling a dictator and spreading democracy and protecting ourselves from weapons of mass destruction.
But one by one, these concocted rationales went up in smoke, fire and ashes. And now the bottom line turns out to be….the bottom line. It is about oil.
Alan Greenspan said so last fall. The former chairman of the Federal Reserve, safely out of office, confessed in his memoir, “…Everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil.”
He elaborated in an interview with the Washington Post‘s Bob Woodward, “If Saddam Hussein had been head of Iraq and there was no oil under those sands, our response to him would not have been as strong as it was in the first Gulf War.”
Remember, also, that soon after the invasion, Donald Rumsfeld’s deputy, Paul Wolfowitz, told the press that war was our only strategic choice.
“We had virtually no economic options with Iraq,” he explained, “because the country floats on a sea of oil.”
Shades of Daniel Plainview, the monstrous petroleum tycoon in the movie “There Will Be Blood.” Half-mad, he exclaims, “There’s a whole ocean of oil under our feet!” then adds, “No one can get at it except for me!”
No wonder American troops only guarded the Ministries of Oil and the Interior in Baghdad, even as looters pillaged museums of their priceless antiquities. They were making sure no one could get at the oil except… guess who?
Here’s a recent headline in The New York Times: “Deals with Iraq Are Set to Bring Oil Giants Back.”
Big Media cuts show independent news still essential
Last week newspaper publisher McClatchy Co., which owns five South Carolina newspapers, announced it is cutting 10 percent of its workforce. Columbia’s The State said cuts would affect about a dozen newsroom positions. The Sun News of Myrtle Beach said it would shed nine jobs, or about 3.6 percent of its staff. The Herald of Rock Hill said it would not eliminate any positions. The Beaufort Gazette and The Island Packet of Hilton Head have not said whether they will cut jobs.
What does this mean for readers? Chris Kromm, editor of Facing South, published by the Institute for Southern Studies, offers this analysis.
******
Reports that newspaper publisher McClatchy Co. is slashing 1,400 jobs this month — 10 percent of its national workforce — sent shockwaves through the media industry and served as a grim reminder of the precarious state of newspapers.
But McClatchy’s massive bloodletting raised a bigger question: When newspapers don’t have reporters, who’s keeping the public informed and shedding light on the state of democracy?
The cuts will be especially hard in the South, where McClatchy owns 15 newspapers. And although McClatchy insists cuts in news reporting will be less than seen at Gannett and other chains, newsrooms will definitely feel the knife.
A survey of the carnage: The Charlotte Observer will cut 123 jobs, or 11 percent of its workforce. The Miami Herald plans 250 job cuts, 17 percent of workers there. The Herald-Leader in Lexington, Ky. is dropping 17 positions. In Raleigh, N.C., the News & Observer is cutting a total of 70 jobs, 16 of them in the newsroom.
But not all will suffer equally. As the Lexington Newspaper Guild pointedly observed, McClatchy gave CEO Gary Pruitt an $800,000 bonus last year and just hired a new corporate vice president, even as the company’s stock was spiraling downward:
The Guild does not believe it is humane when employees who have put in a lifetime of service to McClatchy and KnightRidder are thrown to the curb, while McClatchy’s excessive corporate bureaucracy remains untouched.
McClatchy’s corporate mindset — so common in today’s Big Media — offers clues to the real problems facing newspapers. It’s not necessarily readership: As McClatchy admits, online readership grew 41 percent in the first quarter of 2008. The problem is an economic mismatch between declining ad revenues and shareholder demands for high profit margins on one hand, and the money needed for in-depth reporting on the other.

